-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Early Type 38 - What Kind of Wood?
I received and just finished cleaning a Type 38. Everything that has a 3 digit number on it matches to the assembly number of 361 or the receiver's last 3 of 009, except for the dust cover. Looks like original finish to me. The serial number is a 960009, putting it somewhere in the 1920's I would speculate since they went to the series blocks of 99,999 around 1933. What is with all the black spotches on the wood's finish? At first I thought they were burn marks, but also noticed them on the inside of the stock that seats the barreled action.
If any one has any information about this particular rifle, please feel free to educate me as this is my first Type 38. Also, the bolt is in the white, except for the cocking handle is blued. Is that correct?
Thanks
Pat
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
05-16-2010 08:15 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
Cocking handle is not blue, just discolored by handling and age. It was bright too. You have a very nice rifle. I never put a dust cover on a rifle if it did not come with one. And don't leave one on a rifle if it does not match. Very disirable 38 rifle. riceone
-
-
-
Legacy Member
The dark marks in the wood are just the effects of time on the dents. I have a light walnut K98k
stock that looks similar, the dents are dark.
Very nice rifle! You really couldn't do much better for your first Type 38.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
riceone
Cocking handle is not blue, just discolored by handling and age. It was bright too. You have a very nice rifle. I never put a dust cover on a rifle if it did not come with one. And don't leave one on a rifle if it does not match. Very disirable 38 rifle. riceone
I took the dust cover off, and it is already stowed away, separate from the rifle. I attached a photo of the bolt grouping. If you look at the bluing color, the line between the white and color looks too perfectly cut to be a naturally occurring effect. Unless the dust cover protected it?? On sight inspection, I would think it was blued, but this is the only 38 I have owned, or even held, so I have no basis for comparison.
Regards,
Pat
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
Milsurp Collector
The dark marks in the wood are just the effects of time on the dents. I have a light walnut
K98k
stock that looks similar, the dents are dark.
Very nice rifle! You really couldn't do much better for your first Type 38.
Thanks - Do anyone know what type of tree was used for the stock? Cherry? Birch?
Thanks
-
Legacy Member
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
A quick look at the picture shows that the rifle in question obviously has a rust blue finish. There are very few gunsmiths in the US that do rust blueing... nearly all of them use the hot salts process, which results in a totally different color of blue. In addition, the small rust specks visible on the tang and receiver are not at all indicative of a reblue.
There's no doubt in my mind that the finish on this rifle is original.
WHOOPS! I was looking at the picture directly above this post, not at the pictures in the OP. The pictures in the OP show a rifle that is much different from the one directly above. I have to agree with "Milsurp Collector" that the finish on the OP's rifle doesn't look quite right for a gun with original finish.
Last edited by conductor; 05-25-2010 at 07:40 PM.