1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member daveboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last On
    11-15-2024 @ 07:06 PM
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    209
    Real Name
    david
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    03:18 AM

    My new 104 year old rifle

    Posted these photos on another site, but wanted to share with you as well. I just finished building up an "as new" 03 from parts I aquired from different sources over the past few years. I wanted my rifle to look and work as almost new, but I wanted it to be an early 03 with the old-style script. I got it to look pretty much like I want, but shooting it will determine if I was successful. Since it's an early model i won't shoot it much, but I do want to make sure it is accurate before I hang it up.

    Enjoy the photos.

    daveboy
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member GUTS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    05-28-2025 @ 03:50 PM
    Location
    South Dakota
    Age
    67
    Posts
    575
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    02:18 AM
    I think it looks great, I would love to shoot it!

  3. #3
    Legacy Member skip_c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-23-2020 @ 09:50 PM
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    88
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    02:18 AM
    Isn't that a low number below 800,000. It might not be safe to shoot.

  4. #4
    Legacy Member daveboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last On
    11-15-2024 @ 07:06 PM
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    209
    Real Name
    david
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    03:18 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by skip_c View Post
    Isn't that a low number below 800,000. It might not be safe to shoot.
    Yes, it is definitely a low number. I referred to that in my original post. However, it headspaces great and I only shoot low-power cast loads through it using carefully inspected and prepared brass. Can't recommend anyone else do that, but I will.

    daveboy

  5. #5
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    03:18 AM
    I've a similar vintage rifle that I shoot fairly regularly. It does fine. Stick to loads w/150 gr flat based bullets at 2700 fps to replicate the original ammo.

  6. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Mohawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Last On
    08-01-2011 @ 02:15 AM
    Location
    Western US
    Posts
    148
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    12:18 AM
    Nice job. I love the old Springfield script. Has anyone ever heard of a 1903 low number blowing apart? Just wondering, as I have shot 2 with low numbers with no problems....

  7. #7
    Legacy Member daveboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last On
    11-15-2024 @ 07:06 PM
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    209
    Real Name
    david
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    03:18 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Mohawk View Post
    Nice job. I love the old Springfield script. Has anyone ever heard of a 1903 low number blowing apart? Just wondering, as I have shot 2 with low numbers with no problems....
    Yes, Mohawk there is a history of early (below S/N 800,000) catastrophic receiver failures. Do a search on this forum, or just google it and you will have more reading material and opinions that you dreamed possible. Like you,( and many thousands of GIs I might add) I have fired low-number 03s with no problem. Having informed myself of the "possible" danger, howerver, I will not fire them with full-power loads.

    daveboy

  8. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Last On
    09-28-2013 @ 08:37 AM
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    52
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    03:18 AM
    Great job on the 03.
    As far as shooting it,I wouldn't but to each his own

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. My C&R Rifle Collection after One Year
    By lthilsdorf in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-27-2010, 04:28 PM
  2. Help identifying year on Springfield Trapdoor rifle serial#229722?
    By Myles in forum Other U.S. Service Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-25-2009, 09:39 PM
  3. Deer rifle suggestions for a 13-year old grandson?
    By Rick the Librarian in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 12-05-2009, 03:21 PM
  4. What year did the M2 kit come out?
    By Curt in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-10-2009, 09:11 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts