1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 4 of 4
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member
    Buccaneer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    05-14-2025 @ 01:11 PM
    Location
    Cardiff Wales UK
    Posts
    474
    Real Name
    Paul Ellis
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    08:35 AM

    Cloned N9 training rifle

    This rifle was discovered as a result of the thread started by Gnr527 as I only borrowed it to help answer some of the questions being asked.
    As you can see from the attatched pictures the rifle on the face of it looks to be in supurb condition but it is just too good.
    The barrel and action a correct but who ever put it together did not do enough homework to get the engraving correct. It is marked as a No9 Mk1, it should have been N 9 and the k in Mk is in the wrong font, the engraving also appears to be slightly further back on the action.
    The 25YDS mark on the rearsight also appears to be in the wrong font but they have also missed off the corresponding graduation mark on the sight. The bolt does not have a serial number at all and the woodwork is also missing its serial number on the forend.
    There is a Savage "S" on the noseband but I don't know if that is significant as these rifles were made up from rifles of different manufacture including the US. There is a small group of marks on the butt just behind the trigger guard and one of them appears to be a U with an arrow inside, could be South African??? The handguard is missing the finger ribs but again I don't know if this is significant.
    This rifle was bought at one of the Bisley fairs several yeas ago by a good friend of mine. He belives it to be the genuine article but with all the above taken into consideration I don't think it is. I know what he paid for it and the good news on that front is that he was not ripped off. On balance he has got a very nice looking rifle that is almost correct and one that shoots well, it's just a shame that someone tried to make it out to be was something that it was not which brings us back to the "repro / clone marked as genuine" argument again
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to Buccaneer For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Wooden Training Rifle- Need Info
    By carbinekid in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-13-2011, 08:17 PM
  2. BSA training rifle
    By Calfed in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-25-2010, 02:47 PM
  3. Ross training rifle
    By bigduke6 in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-17-2009, 01:05 PM
  4. Swift Training Rifle $
    By 1988RRC in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-03-2009, 11:03 AM
  5. Cdn No. 7 Training Rifle In .22lr (CGN Private Ad)
    By Badger in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 02:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts