+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: SA 1940 rifle with London proofs

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:40 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,470
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    04:46 AM

    SA 1940 rifle with London proofs

    This mid 1940 rifle has an exc condion S-A 8-40 barrel with London proofs. The rifle is not original and is without the comp and keystone springs but has the round body follower. The stock was replaced too. I did find a data sheet in a early GCAicon newsletter that had s/n 7860 with an S-A 8-40 barrel also with London NP proofs. Are there any other S-A 8-40 barrels around with London proofs ?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to RCS For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Phrogpilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-14-2015 @ 05:19 PM
    Location
    Pensacola, Fl
    Posts
    121
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    03:46 AM
    Ive seen alot of early guns (from like June 1941 to March of 1942) but never one from 1940...

  4. #3
    Contributing Member Bob Seijas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-11-2024 @ 03:06 PM
    Location
    Montville, NJ and Delray Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,265
    Real Name
    Bob Seijas
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    04:46 AM

    LL

    The LL details specifically mention rebuilt rifles, including updated old front end (gas trap) guns, WRA, and a certain percentage from new production. I have never seen a WRA with Brit proofs. Previous low LL serial I had seen was a 77,000 gun back in the 1970's. London proofs are scarce. Nice rifle!
    Real men measure once and cut.

  5. #4
    Legacy Member Joe W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-20-2021 @ 09:25 PM
    Location
    S.W. Florida
    Posts
    720
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    05:46 AM
    Is it more likly or at least possible, that this is a rifle that was in Britishicon hands BEFORE the Lend Lease program ???
    Last edited by Joe W; 12-07-2011 at 01:22 PM.

  6. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Ben Hartley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-04-2015 @ 11:56 AM
    Location
    Jaffrey, New Hampshire
    Age
    86
    Posts
    85
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    04:46 AM
    Joe...

    Regarding:

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe W View Post
    Is it more likly or at least possible, that this is a rifle that was in Britishicon hands BEFORE the Lend Lease program ???
    Someone correct me if I'm mistaken (a distinct possibility!), but the whole point of Lend-Lease in the first place was to allow the US to loan military hardware to our allies. That idea of long-term loan was to slide around the prohibition of outright sales to anyone, as mandated by the Neutrality Acts. It seems unlikely that any M1icon rifle -- nay, M1 canteen cup -- was in British possession prior to Lend Lease.

    Ben Hartley

  7. #6
    Legacy Member Tom Doniphon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    @
    Posts
    322
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    02:46 AM
    Wouldn't they have changed out that buttstock to one with a trap door buttplate if the gun had been rebuilt and was to be part of the LL rifle shipments?

    EDIT: Strike what I said above. I just re-read RCS' description of the rifle in which he said the stock had been replaced. I wonder what was on it before being swapped?
    Last edited by Tom Doniphon; 12-07-2011 at 10:18 PM.

  8. #7
    Legacy Member emmagee1917's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    11-27-2022 @ 11:10 AM
    Location
    Yuma , Arizona
    Posts
    1,402
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    02:46 AM
    Not exactly. A private firm making a product for the military could sell thier product to our allies before lend / lease . Savage with thier #4mk1s , S/W pre-victories , Thompsons , etc. In the M1icon's case , though , only Winchester would have been able to but they'd would of had to BE making them to do so . Also , the M1 was in short supply early on , so I don't think any sales would have been approved even if Winchester delivery was posible.
    Chris

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Inland Stock Proofs
    By vern21 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-19-2011, 10:14 PM
  2. Chile Mauser with British proofs
    By Patrick Chadwick in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-31-2010, 04:35 PM
  3. Help with P Proofs
    By The Lemming in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-22-2009, 08:34 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts