1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 3 of 3
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member jrhead75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    02-03-2021 @ 10:28 PM
    Location
    Washington State, USA
    Posts
    354
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    05:23 PM

    One of the burning questions of our time laid to rest...

    Well it's not quite as dramatic as that, but I did manage to stumble across some source material on a question that was discussed here some time back.

    Purely by luck, I happened upon a blurb towards the end of John Walter's excellent "Guns of the Gurkhas" that mentioned the Indian practice of stamping the initials of the issuing arsenal along with the other data on the stock disks, and cited "Instructions for Armourers, Government of India Army Department, 1911", so I dug up a copy and (as seen in the below scans), found this...

    Attachment 31040 Attachment 31041

    The one difference I've noted between instruction and practice seems to be the addition of the 'A' for 'Arsenal' for those locations with only one initial. In other words, Fort William Arsenal and Rawal Pindi Arsenal are usually denoted simply 'F.W.' & 'R.P.' while facilities like Quetta and Allahabad Arsenals would be denoted 'Q.A.' & 'A.A'. I don't recall ever seeing one stamped with only the single initial as illustrated in table VII above.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 8 Members Say Thank You to jrhead75 For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. 1941 Fazakerley No.4 Mk.1 missing pieces - questions, questions, questions....
    By spinecracker in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-05-2011, 05:31 PM
  2. Help to identify this wood burning military stove.........
    By GNX Guy in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-30-2011, 11:29 AM
  3. The best laid plans...
    By Nate in forum Martini Henry Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-05-2009, 09:23 AM
  4. somebody buy one of these and let the rest of us
    By goo in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-19-2009, 02:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts