1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 5 of 5
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ssj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last On
    11-13-2017 @ 01:21 PM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    651
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    08:40 PM

    No4 mk2 going awol.

    So I went shooting today, practicing for the Dick Travis VC shoot next weekend. I have been chasing an issue with the No4 for a while. It shoots the first 3~5 shots very well, vertical dispersion is under well Under 2MOA, horizontal about 2 MOA. On the next shot it throws 6MOA high and then shoots the next 4 or so up there (but a little more dispersed). The next 4 are not grouped terribly well at all.

    So what I have done so far is I found the stock had bananna'd a wee bit and there was a gap under the receiver. So placed a 30thou wood shim the length of the bottom of the receiver and epoxyed it into the well. Now when the main screw is done up tight you can see the imprint of the receiver the length of the wood and even maybe imprinted 5 thou into the wood. The draws seem tight, you have to lightly hammer the end of the forestock into the wedge so that seems tight. The re-inforce of the barrel bed seems tight, front bed OK.

    So frankly I am stumped.

    Does this symptom suggest what I should to look at to you?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by ssj; 03-14-2015 at 03:09 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts