+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: New Impulse Purchase - M1917 Eddystone

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    cipherk98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    278
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    10:59 AM

    New Impulse Purchase - M1917 Eddystone

    So I went to a gun show the other day and first thing I find in the door is an Eddystone M1917 at a reasonable price which caught my eye. Stand owner wasn't there so I took a walk through to see what else I could find, but didn't find anything else that was on my short list or at a price that made it had to have. Came back, talked to the owner, and wound up getting it for a bit less than it was marked at. Even came with an original leather sling though it is not in any shape to be used with the gun, though the cleaning kit was there. I've wanted one of these but hadn't really researched them, but the price was too good to pass up so I made my move.

    The reason I got it at a good price as the gun is/was a bit rough condition wise. The most obvious issue is the stock was refinished with some kind of shellac or something while the bands were still on and the receiver was still in the gun. The hand guards were stuck to the stock and this goop was all down in the action! The other is that the bore is a bit questionable though using a .30-06 dummy round as a rough guide the muzzle doesn't seem to be TOO bad.

    As for the stock and metal, it cleaned up great. Some denatured alcohol cleaned the nasty refinish up on the wood and the over application onto the metal. It did raise the grain a little but since the original finish seems like it is there under the wood I see no need to sand it, just rubbed it down in some BLOicon and called it a day. No before pictures but it was pretty rough looking before so this is an improvement. The parkerizing actually doesn't look too bad on the action aside from a couple odd wear spots on the left and the bolt stop, with the bands and barrel having the expected wear. Look as good as I can expect after oiling it, given it's approaching 100 years old and probably went through two World Wars.

    Gun is mostly matching. The barrel and stock are original Eddystone as are most of the small parts, though the rear sight ladder/elevator is Remington. Notably it appears the bolt was replaced with a WWII K bolt which is a slight bummer but better for the gun as a shooter, though all the parts on it with visible external markings are Eddystone. The buttplate was painted black but I don't think that is correct either. Aside from the E on the end the stock it has a "C" with a cartouche above the trigger guard and a "9B" below it, near the heel and no P to indicate a refurb.

    Not all of the pictures came out but here are a few, post clean up.








    The reason they were on the wish list though is I have a family connection to these guns. My great grandfather worked at Baldwin Locomotive, I believe as a machinist or heavy equipment (ie press or forge) operator but it's lost to time. Not sure which shop he worked at and if he did actually work on these, but he was working there in this time frame which is good enough for me. Plus Eddystone is fairly local so that is cool too.

    In taking it shooting I was happy with the end result. Group at 100 yards was pretty solid with off the shelf ammo. Took 6 shots, one sight in shot and one for the group. Averaged out to about 2", including the shot off to the left. Note the top left is not from keyholing, it's from the chicken wire tearing the paper when I took it off the target stand.



    Overall really like shooting it. Not too loud and very mild kick. It does seem like the bolt could be a bit smoother when opening after firing and in general operation, so might need another coat of oil on it. Other than that I see this one getting shot a lot, especially as I plan to use .30-06 as my "starter" round for reloading.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member pickax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 07:08 AM
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    166
    Real Name
    Brad
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    10:59 AM
    Well, it sure cleaned up well! I have a question about the bolt. Can you explain better about a K bolt? I've never heard of it.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    cipherk98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    278
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    10:59 AM
    Thread Starter
    My understanding is bolts stamped with K or USMC (United Shoe Machine Corp) are replacement bolts fitted to the guns when they were overhauled around WWII, as apparently the originals were prone to galling the receiver. I do not know if this gun actually ever was overhauled at an arsenal or was just a part someone put on afterwards.

  6. #4
    Legacy Member pickax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 07:08 AM
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    166
    Real Name
    Brad
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    10:59 AM
    Thanks, and enjoy that nice rifle!

  7. #5
    Legacy Member RC20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last On
    02-07-2022 @ 09:20 PM
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    316
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    05:59 AM
    The bolts are sticky on all of them . I belive its the metal mix (nickel with steel). Gives great strength for receiver but does not slide smoothly with the bolt of the same material.

    Oddly no mention of that in any literature of WWI I have read. 1903 is far smoother (though of course they had the receiver issue.) Worst WWII bolt in an 1903A3 is better.

    It would seem to be a combat issue but again nothing said. Odd

    Pure speculation that it was better then and age changed the surface chemically so not so great now.

    That said, its miner for me, more a question than a curiosity and while I like shooting a great deal, I get a kick out of the 1917s. Something that just grabs me and those have my heart.
    Last edited by RC20; 03-17-2016 at 12:16 PM.

  8. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Seaspriter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Last On
    09-23-2019 @ 02:42 PM
    Location
    Naples, Florida USA
    Posts
    718
    Real Name
    R. Porter Lynch
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    10:59 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by cipherk98 View Post
    The reason they were on the wish list though is I have a family connection to these guns. My great grandfather worked at Baldwin Locomotive, I believe as a machinist or heavy equipment (ie press or forge) operator but it's lost to time. Not sure which shop he worked at and if he did actually work on these, but he was working there in this time frame which is good enough for me.
    You'd probably really appreciate knowing more of the history of the Eddystone plant your grandfather worked at. You can access it at:
    http://www.remingtonsociety.org/the-story-of-eddystone/
    Last edited by Seaspriter; 03-17-2016 at 12:44 PM.

  9. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    MOS-45B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    03-23-2016 @ 08:38 PM
    Posts
    17
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    09:59 AM
    Nice 1917. Above average.

    A letter "K" stamped on the underside of the bolt handle would identify this as a Kingsbury bolt made in WW 2.

    If a letter "K" were stamped on the top side of the bolt handle, it would be an Eddystone bolt made during WW 1.

    Eddystone stamped the top side of their bolts with letters A through Z for some reason.

  10. #8
    Legacy Member RC20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last On
    02-07-2022 @ 09:20 PM
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    316
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    05:59 AM
    Darn it, now I will have to look!

    I will add that the nickel steel mix is more complicated than just strong, though it is that.

    Its highly desirable character is it stretches rather than burst.

    So if you push it too far its should not fragment.

    Having seen a Model 70 Winchester do that recently (fragment) you have to wonder if they have gone backwards.

    While the shooter got some of his teeth knocked out (scope) and an adjutant shooter got a smack on the cheek its better than what it could have been.

  11. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    cipherk98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    278
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    10:59 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Seaspriter View Post
    You'd probably really appreciate knowing more of the history of the Eddystone plant your grandfather worked at. You can access it at:
    http://www.remingtonsociety.org/the-story-of-eddystone/
    Thanks for the link. Very interesting reading. I honestly don't have any real proof my great grand father ever worked on the gun lines as the original plant around Broad & 15th Street were closer to where I believe his family lived at that time around Port Richmond and Fishtown with other Polish immigrants. As with the work he did at Baldwin, most of that information is unfortunately long gone. That said Baldwin still built a number of wonderful locomotives that I get to visit every so often at local museum that has several, including 3 or 4 in operation.

    Quote Originally Posted by MOS-45B View Post
    Nice 1917. Above average.

    A letter "K" stamped on the underside of the bolt handle would identify this as a Kingsbury bolt made in WW 2.

    If a letter "K" were stamped on the top side of the bolt handle, it would be an Eddystone bolt made during WW 1.

    Eddystone stamped the top side of their bolts with letters A through Z for some reason.
    Thank you for the compliment. The K is on the underside as is the proof, so it would then be a WWII bolt.

    Edit: Wanted to add, hopefully two months from now I'll get to shoot a CMPicon-style match with this rifle as it fits with the theme (US Bolt) and really see it (and I!) do. Depending on when my ammo comes in I may do next month's as well.
    Last edited by cipherk98; 03-21-2016 at 07:33 PM.

  12. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    MOS-45B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    03-23-2016 @ 08:38 PM
    Posts
    17
    Local Date
    06-16-2024
    Local Time
    09:59 AM
    My grand father was a locomotive engineer from 1905 to about 1954. He operated Baldwin, (and other) steam and diesel locos on the Baltimore and Ohio Line.

    Baldwin made hundreds of steam locos for the Baltimore and Ohio during the first half of the 20th century. I got to go for rides in the cabs of those monsters when I was a kid.

    Your 1917 is a great shooter. 2 inch groups at 100 yards is excellent for an Enfield. I am getting 4 inch groups with my low serial Eddystone and quite content with that.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. My only M1917 Eddystone
    By yoopercollector in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-12-2015, 08:37 AM
  2. M1917 Eddystone Questions
    By chaoticmachinery in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-17-2012, 04:07 PM
  3. Refinish Eddystone M1917?
    By SPAD 124 in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-24-2011, 09:35 AM
  4. M1917 eddystone 30-06
    By mac1911 in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 03:18 PM
  5. M1917 Eddystone
    By AlReiter in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-17-2009, 07:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts