-
Contributing Member
New info for the forum!
A well respected gun writer here has just brought in some new measurements for the H/S limits for the 303 cartridge.
He has done allot for the sport of shooting and is quite knowledgeable but I find the information he has given on the matter a bit well out there.
He is talking about reloading for the 303 and the article is quite good right up until you get to this bit;
He explains how the Lee headspaces which is fine but then goes on to say;
.064" Minimum (Fine), .074" Normal Maximum (Not sure here as this should be No GO right there) then this one .098" (No Go Gauge) Wartime Maximum?
I thought there was an EYO of .078 like you were being overun and these were the only rifles left in the rack of wherever but .098 may be a bit much I stand to be corrected on my understanding of this.
Personnally I would rather go on what advice I get here and may drop this person a line that although well intentioned his reasoning may be I think the correct figures need to be stated otherwise someone will say yep at a .074 H/S I can shoot the ol' 303 with not too much concern as they did as it is the normal maximum.
Any advice on this one gents so I can get the correct information to the person concerned.............what would you do!
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
Last edited by CINDERS; 05-01-2017 at 11:18 AM.
-
-
04-30-2017 10:49 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
CINDERS
... the article is quite good right up until you get to this bit;
He explains how the Lee headspaces which is fine but then goes on to say;
.064" Minimum (Fine), .074" Normal Maximum (Not sure here as this should be No GO right there) then this one .098" (No Go Gauge) Wartime Maximum?
I thought there was an EYO of .078 like you were being overun and these were the only rifles left in the rack of wherever but .098 may be a bit much I stand to be corrected on my understanding of this.
Personnally I would rather go on what advice I get here and may drop this person a line that although well intentioned his reasoning may be I think the correct figures need to be stated otherwise someone will say yep at a .074 H/S I can shoot the ol' 303 with not too much concern as they did as it is the normal maximum.
Any advice on this one gents so I can get the correct information to the person concerned.............what would you do!
Post this on the Lee-Enfield forum and see what a professional expert such as Peter Laidler
says. Then send the author a link pointing to the answer.
-
Thank You to Patrick Chadwick For This Useful Post:
-
-
Legacy Member
Just tell him to correct his typo because it is clearly a mistake.

Originally Posted by
CINDERS
A well respected gun writer here has just brought in some new measurements for the H/S limits for the 303 cartridge.
He has done allot for the sport of shooting and is quite knowledgeable but I find the information he has given on the matter a bit well out there.
He is talking about reloading for the 303 and the article is quite good right up until you get to this bit;
He explains how the Lee headspaces which is fine but then goes on to say;
.064" Minimum (Fine), .074" Normal Maximum (Not sure here as this should be No GO right there) then this one .098" (No Go Gauge) Wartime Maximum?
I thought there was an EYO of .078 like you were being overun and these were the only rifles left in the rack of wherever but .098 may be a bit much I stand to be corrected on my understanding of this.
Personnally I would rather go on what advice I get here and may drop this person a line that although well intentioned his reasoning may be I think the correct figures need to be stated otherwise someone will say yep at a .074 H/S I can shoot the ol' 303 with not too much concern as they did as it is the normal maximum.
Any advice on this one gents so I can get the correct information to the person concerned.............what would you do!
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to ireload2 For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Yep typo and poor proof reading IMO
-
Thank You to P246 For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
See this one I re-posted it to another part of milsurps Thanks for the replies.
https://www.milsurps.com/showthread....602#post399602
-