+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: No 4 (T) tech data.

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member XL39E1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last On
    04-16-2025 @ 11:13 AM
    Location
    Southern England
    Posts
    156
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    08:25 AM
    Attachment 114459

    The Mount and pads drawing does provide the location dimensions of the pad centre line.
    Front face of action to centre of front pad is 1.5inches, then front pad to rear pad centre line is then 3.6inches.

    These identical dimensions appear on 4 different and revised mount drawings, from 1940 to 1970.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by XL39E1; 01-23-2021 at 04:17 AM.

  2. The Following 7 Members Say Thank You to XL39E1 For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,069
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    12:25 AM
    A post-war drawing apparently.

    Interesting that the collimation tolerance is 5 MOA!

    Anyone know what "C.P.C. Treatment 600" is?
    Last edited by Surpmil; 01-23-2021 at 02:47 PM.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  4. #3
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:21 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,756
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    08:25 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Surpmil View Post
    A post-war drawing apparently.

    Interesting that the collimation tolerance is 5 MOA!

    Anyone know what "C.P.C. Treatment 600" is?

    C.P.C is a UKicon manufacturer of chemicals, protective coatings paints and oils (WD40 type stuff)

    No idea what their '600' product may have been but their product range would fit into the notation :

    "Phosphate finish 1/1 Finished with Black (spirit) stain and C.P.C. Treatment 600"
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  5. Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Legacy Member XL39E1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last On
    04-16-2025 @ 11:13 AM
    Location
    Southern England
    Posts
    156
    Local Date
    07-07-2025
    Local Time
    08:25 AM
    The No32 bracket drawing was the 1970 version, amended 7 times from original.

    Attachment 114504

    Also the wartime trials no53 mount drawing dated 1944 has the same pad placement.

  7. Thank You to XL39E1 For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Amazing tech these days
    By Vincent in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-08-2016, 10:25 PM
  2. New Poly Tech's In Canada
    By vettefever333 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-17-2009, 04:56 PM
  3. EO Tech sight on 98 Mauser
    By Ockhamsrifle in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-16-2009, 05:21 AM
  4. Mag Tech small pistol primers
    By Sid in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-27-2009, 07:46 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts