+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 77

Thread: 1918 T-Gewehr Bullets

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #51
    Legacy Member rescuerandy2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2024 @ 08:13 PM
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    311
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    07:14 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks! Looking to be about 90 days for the lathe-created cartridges. Powder, primers, and a running motor hear in Miami while I have have not heard back on the bullets or dies. Again, thanks to all. Randy

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #52
    Legacy Member rescuerandy2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2024 @ 08:13 PM
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    311
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    07:14 AM
    Thread Starter
    Next Issue.

    The first version bipod is in excellent condition but I am wondering about the originality of the heavily applied paint:



    What say you all? Thanks, Randy

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #53
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:12 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,332
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    04:14 AM
    Hard to say. It's been a hundred years after all. Most of those were destroyed in action so how does one come out newish?
    Regards, Jim

  6. #54
    Legacy Member rescuerandy2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2024 @ 08:13 PM
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    311
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    07:14 AM
    Thread Starter
    Agreed. That's why I am wondering what's under all that nice paint. Not sure where I caught some text on reproductions coming out of Franceicon? Do I have an original or reproduction. Randy

  7. #55
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:12 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,332
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    04:14 AM
    I can't even guess decently about originality on this one. Too rare...
    Regards, Jim

  8. #56
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    01:14 PM

    Paint not original. Metal - maybe???

    Look closely at the 4th foto. One can see a screw head with a burred slot. The paint is intact on top of the burred metal. The burring action would have produced blank metal at this point.

    I therefore deduce that the paint at least is not original. No surprise after a century!

    However, the fact that the paint is of later date does not provide decisive evidence about the originality of the metal underneath. It could have been used - repainted - and used again.

    If you also come to the conclusion that the paint is not original, then it would not be harmful in the antique-original sense to remove the paint in very small areas to reveal the markings. Although markings are the most obvious features for fakery!

    That leaves us with the standard question: does the wear pattern look believable?

    As Jim pointed out, we have no objects available for comparison, and the present set of photos leave me with a “could be???” feeling.

    More close-ups of the wear points please!
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 02-27-2022 at 12:03 PM.

  9. Thank You to Patrick Chadwick For This Useful Post:


  10. #57
    Legacy Member rescuerandy2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2024 @ 08:13 PM
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    311
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    07:14 AM
    Thread Starter
    Gentlemen, more photos tomorrow. I will need the daylight to get at the areas that may give us a better clue. Thanks, Randy

  11. #58
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:12 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    30,332
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    04:14 AM
    There's such a variation in the bipods too. Seems to be several different types...
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	tg_11.jpg‎
Views:	42
Size:	38.0 KB
ID:	124625   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8826-3.jpg‎
Views:	46
Size:	199.8 KB
ID:	124626   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8825-3.jpg‎
Views:	44
Size:	188.2 KB
ID:	124627  
    Regards, Jim

  12. #59
    Legacy Member rescuerandy2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2024 @ 08:13 PM
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    311
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    07:14 AM
    Thread Starter
    Yes, mine is the early, rivetted version. As I can see on the images of that first version above, there is that green paint. While the paint on my bipod is similar, and has been laid on thick as I have seen on others like mine, it does look like it was painted recently. Images at several auction sites do show these early bipods without paint. In those images, the early bipods seem to have a similar finish to the later model bipods. I am suggesting that the black finish of the second version might also be what was given to or has developed on the first version bipod. This is leading me more and more to removing the thick, newish, green paint. Randy

  13. Thank You to rescuerandy2 For This Useful Post:


  14. #60
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    01:14 PM

    The rivetted bipod is from the MG 08/15

    According to the book "Das Tankgewehr Mauser M 1918" by Wolfgang Kern (ISBN 3-933481-06-6), the bipod in Jim's 1st foto is an original Tankgewehr bipod, made from solid material. There are probably very few of those still around.

    The one favored by the PBI who had to carry all that gear was the bipod for the MG 08/15, which was a much lighter "plug-in" replacement. This is the type in Jim's 2nd and 3rd fotos. That is what Randy has got. There are probably considerably more of these around, reflecting the larger quantity of MG 08/15s. And the color of the paint (if it is even original) does not seem to indicate a different version.

    The book mentions (P116) that if one had to make a "strategic withdrawal" the heavy bipod was the first thing to be dumped, and also observes that the majority of photos of a T-Gewehr in the field show it without a bipod at all. Many riflemen would have seen little sense in using a bipod (which anyway tended to sink into the muddy earth) and thus be forced to stick one's head out further than absolutely necessary. Resting the beast on the parapet of the trench was simpler - and safer!

    Randy, that book is a must! And if anyone knows a better one on the T-Gewehr, please let me know!
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 03-01-2022 at 04:35 PM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. My Gewehr 98
    By Ovidio in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 11-12-2019, 01:49 PM
  2. Got the Gewehr 88/05 out!
    By Eaglelord17 in forum Range Reports - Show us how good you are!
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-06-2019, 02:33 AM
  3. First Gewehr 43
    By daytonlawvol in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-19-2017, 03:03 PM
  4. New (to me) Gewehr 88/05
    By Eaglelord17 in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-18-2016, 06:45 PM
  5. Gewehr Mod 98
    By Treeman in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-09-2011, 07:59 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts