1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Louis of PA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-12-2009 @ 12:04 PM
    Posts
    380
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    11:42 AM

    Pennsylvanians! Rendell's assault on our gun rights began TODAY!

    As expected, once they lost the Supreme Court case, I predicted they'd attack around our flanks.

    I believe the Messiah and his henchmen have come up with this idea of encouraging the individual states to go after gun owners, one state at a time. They probably believe they can pick off one state at a time.

    Regards, and BECOME ACTIVE!
    Louis of PA




    Mayor, chief: Ban assault weapons

    Pittsburgh slayings prompt renewed call

    Intelligencer Journal
    Published: Apr 16, 2009

    By BRETT HAMBRIGHT, Staff Writer

    Mayor Rick Gray and police Chief Keith Sadler joined Gov. Ed Rendell on Wednesday in a plea to Congress to reinstate a ban on assault weapons like the one used recently to kill three Pittsburgh police officers.


    The Lancaster city officials and nearly a dozen other Pennsylvania mayors and public safety officials called for a re-enactment of an expired law designed to prevent individuals like Richard Poplawski from buying the high-powered weapons.


    On April 4, Poplawski, armed with an AK-47 assault rifle and other weapons, allegedly ambushed Pittsburgh policemen responding to a domestic call at his home. Poplawski is accused of killing three officers and wounding a fourth.

    Rendell used the tragedy as an example of why such high-powered, rapid-fire weapons should be banned — as they were from 1994 to 2004. Such weapons can give criminals an upper hand over police, the governor said.


    Following the news conference in Harrisburg, Gray and Sadler echoed the governor's belief that assault weapons have no place here — or anywhere.

    "If we are going to send (police officers) out and ask them to protect us, we have an obligation to put them in the best possible position we can," Gray said Wednesday night.

    Arguments that the weapons are used by sportsmen and hunters is "fallacious," Gray said.


    "Nobody assaults as a sport," Gray said. "The very name of the weapon indicates it has no place in a civilized society."


    Sadler and Gray dismissed arguments that assault weapons are valuable for home protection and should be available to hunters.


    Assault weapons fired inside a home pose more of a threat to the occupants than any invader because they are hard to handle and even harder to aim, Sadler said.

    "What you may do is miss the bad guy and (the bullet) goes through a wall and hits one of your loved ones," he said.


    Sadler and 10 Lancaster city officers attended the funerals in Pittsburgh last week. Wednesday afternoon, Sadler stood with Pittsburgh's police chief and other police officials during the governor's plea.

    A collection of confiscated assault weapons was displayed on a table in front of the governor.

    Sadler said such firearms are "weapons of choice" for drug pushers and gangbangers. Lancaster city, and local suburbs are not immune from criminals armed with the weapons, the chief said.

    "They're in our midst, that's for sure. Over the years, there has been confiscation of these weapons" in Lancaster city, Sadler said. "It's obvious that these weapons are available."


    Rendell, who fought crime as Philadelphia's district attorney and mayor, reeled off a list of government statistics that he said underscored the effectiveness of the former ban on assault weapons.


    "People who say these laws don't matter, they're dead wrong," he said.

    In 1994, Congress approved a 10-year federal ban on the sale of assault weapons and let it expire in 2004. Prospects for a re-enactment are not bright.

    Last month, 65 House Democrats — including five from Pennsylvania — wrote to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to say they would oppose re-enacting the law. Such heavy Democratic opposition probably would doom any legislative drive.

    "It depends on whether the general assembly has a spine or not," Gray said.


    Authorities say Poplawski used an AK-47 assault rifle and other weapons when he allegedly gunned down the Pittsburgh officers earlier this month. Officers Eric Kelly, Stephen Mayhle and Paul Sciullo arrived at Poplawski's home early on April 4 after Poplawski's mother called 911 to report that they were arguing and she needed police assistance.


    "These (officers) were answering some innocuous call on a Saturday morning, and walk into a guy with an AK-47 and a bulletproof vest on," Gray said.

    Sadler said, "Somebody with a weapon of carnage like that can really do a lot of damage, inflict a lot of pain in a short amount of time," Sadler said. "You just hold the trigger and bullets come flying out."


    Also Wednesday, Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and Pittsburgh police Chief Nate Harper Jr. expressed disbelief that the officers' deaths would not change minds on Capitol Hill.


    "How much blood has to be spilled on the streets of America?" Harper asked.

    Speaking later, Ravenstahl said, "If the events of the last Saturday in Pittsburgh don't change your mind, I don't know what will."


    The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    E-mail: bhambright@lnpnews.com
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ibmcarbine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    09-18-2015 @ 04:06 PM
    Location
    Hershey.PA
    Age
    79
    Posts
    2
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    11:42 AM
    Sandler thinks that the AK47 you can purchase in the United Statesicon is a fully automatic firearm. I don't think so but as far as I am concerned, the only qualification for an assault weapon is fully automatic operation.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    (Deceased April 21, 2018) John Sukey (Deceased)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last On
    05-14-2012 @ 06:03 PM
    Location
    Tucson Arizona
    Posts
    762
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    08:42 AM
    Rendell and his cohorts are perfect examples of the south end of their party symbol and what comes out of their mouths is roughly the same as what comes out of the back end of that symbol

  5. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    George Sr.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-24-2012 @ 12:40 PM
    Posts
    40
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    10:42 AM
    Rendell has been an anti gun person since his days as an assistaint DA in the 1970's nothing new here. He has also had zero sucess in passing any legislation in pA>

  6. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    kaotic01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-21-2012 @ 05:11 AM
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    8
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    11:42 AM
    I can only say one thing about this, I DID NOT VOTE FOR THE MAN!! and having said that anyone who did and is crying about the ban should shut there mouths. I don't believe this ban will ever be passed. PA is still a fairly liberal gun state and I hope it stays that way. I would like to see my children be able to enjoy the things I currently am doing and if any law like that is passed it will not only infringe on my rights but the rights of our children.

  7. #6
    (Deceased April 21, 2018) John Sukey (Deceased)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last On
    05-14-2012 @ 06:03 PM
    Location
    Tucson Arizona
    Posts
    762
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    08:42 AM
    I love that bit about A-salt weapons not being useful for home defence because they are "hard to handle" and "hard to aim".
    Haven't the liberals constantly been telling us that A-salt weapons are so simple that small children could use them?

  8. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    TomSudz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-09-2009 @ 04:48 PM
    Location
    Northeast PA
    Posts
    44
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    10:42 AM
    When are they going to ban assault dispatchers? Maybe if the dispatcher told the responding officers that the man was wearing body armor, had weapons and a large quantity of ammunition on him (information the dispatcher had), they would have done things differently. Those cops didn't have to die and I'd like to see the dispatcher stand trial as an accessory!

  9. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Ken C.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-22-2010 @ 09:28 PM
    Location
    Florida/N.J./WI
    Age
    91
    Posts
    117
    Local Date
    04-25-2025
    Local Time
    10:42 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by TomSudz View Post
    When are they going to ban assault dispatchers? Maybe if the dispatcher told the responding officers that the man was wearing body armor, had weapons and a large quantity of ammunition on him (information the dispatcher had), they would have done things differently. Those cops didn't have to die and I'd like to see the dispatcher stand trial as an accessory!
    Tom,. unless you had access to the telephone and radio communications, do not be too quick to condemn the dispatcher. I spent considerable time investigating complaints against communications operators as well as defending myself against stories that in most public venues could be described as slander and libel,and I know firsthand that 99 % of them are a mixture of idle speculation, resentment, misinterpretation of what was heard, and lack of understanding of just what was involved.
    In other words, those who dont like the message have a strong tendency to blame the messenger. I agree that if there was malfeasance, then there should be appropriate punishment. In my experience, that is seldom the case however, and those who brought the (In most cases) frivolous charges didnt even bother to apologize, even when shown they were talking through their anus.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. South Florida Sun-Sentinel Assault Weapons Poll.
    By NightMaher in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-18-2009, 05:04 PM
  2. D.C. gun laws; Pelosi & black caucus meet to undo gun rights
    By Louis of PA in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-07-2009, 07:21 PM
  3. Pribor-3B assault rifle
    By Cutaway in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-01-2009, 01:12 AM
  4. The German Assault Rifle 1935-1945
    By buffdog in forum Book and Video Review Corner
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-22-2008, 06:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts