Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
Plainly, nobody needs to be qualified as a mathematician nor a career in external ballistics to realize that it is quite impossible to have the same bullet, leaving the same rifle with the same sights and sight radius, at the same muzzle velocity, take two completely different paths with 2.5 MOA of variation, from the same point of firing to the same point of impact at the same range.
Why in your opinion was a variation of 2 MOA at 100 yards mentioned in STL as acceptable and possible?

Would a similar variation be likely to exist in ammo used for this purpose in the Britishicon Army at that time?