+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 112

Thread: More Bad Press For The Enfield

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member ireload2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    not Canada
    Posts
    450
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    01:12 PM
    >>>1. The more tapered .303 case presumably puts more pressure on the bolt and receiver than the more parallel-sided 7.62mm case?<<<

    Why do you presume that?


    >>>Next an action to slice up and measure cross sections<<<

    This is not necessary.
    Measure it with calipers. Where you have difficulty measure small rectangle and triangles and add their areas. It should take you a whopping 30 minutes.
    If you have doubts measure to your best ability. Use an added 10% if you like. Use -10% too. The real number should fall between those values. This is not magic. It is engineering. Close counts like horseshoes, hand grenades and thermonuclear devices.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,008
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    11:12 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ireload2 View Post
    >>>1. The more tapered .303 case presumably puts more pressure on the bolt and receiver than the more parallel-sided 7.62mm case?<<<

    Why do you presume that?
    I should rephrase that to say "given an equal case contact area and charge".

    I understood it was generally recognized that the more steeply a case tapered, the less adhesion to the chamber walls. Is that not correct?

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Banned Edward Horton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    09-10-2011 @ 01:42 PM
    Location
    Harrisburg, PA USA
    Age
    74
    Posts
    935
    Local Date
    04-27-2025
    Local Time
    02:12 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Surpmil View Post
    I should rephrase that to say "given an equal case contact area and charge".

    I understood it was generally recognized that the more steeply a case tapered, the less adhesion to the chamber walls. Is that not correct?
    Surpmil, you are 100% correct and didn't "presume" anything

    .303 Improved Epps

    The 303 Britishicon suffers from "droopy shoulders". Good in its day, the shallow angle was designed to help in loading and placement of the long stranded propellant "cordite", within the case. While good for factory production then, it's a real problem for the reloader today.

    Any cartridge with shallow shoulders is more prone to case stretching, case wall thinning and thickening around the neck. Maximum loads fired from these cases accelerate the process.

    Canadianicon gunsmith Ellwood Epps saw the problem and corrected it. He knew that steeply angled shoulders helped modern spherical and extruded powders burn more within the case and less up the barrel. His solution was to increase the shoulder angle to 35 degrees from 16. At the same time, he decreased the body taper by over 50 thou. The resulting improved cartridge showed a 15 % velocity enhancement over the standard 303 British when fired from the P-14.

    After consulting with PO Ackley, Mr Epps reformed the cases with minimal body taper and sharply angled shoulders. Reduced body taper lessens the rearward pressure effects on the bolt and lugs (bolt thrust). Sharp shoulder angles inhibit forward brass flow, which reduces the need to trim cases as often.

    Originally, the improvements were made to increase brass life, not to produce a higher velocity round. Mr Epps knew that reshaping the case into a more efficient design would yield this secondary benefit, but considered improved case life to be the most important factor.



    303 Epps - Notes on Improved Cases

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Lee Turret Press Problem
    By Sid in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-04-2009, 01:51 AM
  2. Hornady Lock N Load Progressive Press
    By Sid in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-17-2009, 08:17 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts