+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 49

Thread: Strength Of Lee Enfield Action

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

ROCK Strength Of Lee Enfield Action 04-18-2012, 02:24 AM
jmoore See this thread (click on... 04-18-2012, 02:59 AM
muffett.2008 Let's just hope that... 04-18-2012, 06:00 AM
Amatikulu You don't have to worry about... 04-18-2012, 07:32 AM
Bear43 When I saw the topic this was... 04-18-2012, 10:50 AM
Thunderbox I've never heard of any sort... 04-18-2012, 06:36 AM
bigduke6 I,ll second that, Think hand... 04-20-2012, 06:51 AM
Ridolpho Useful stuff 04-20-2012, 06:41 PM
No4Mk1(T) Well I can’t disagree with... 04-21-2012, 01:26 AM
HOOKED ON HISTORY As a novice I place my trust... 04-23-2012, 05:54 PM
Peter Laidler I agree 1000% with T/box. In... 04-18-2012, 08:10 AM
Badger Here's another related thread... 04-18-2012, 08:39 AM
BubbaTheKid I just read thru that thread.... 04-18-2012, 11:15 AM
Lee Enfield The one I examined some years... 04-18-2012, 11:59 AM
Thunderbox How does that happen, given... 04-18-2012, 12:58 PM
Beerhunter What on earth are those... 04-18-2012, 01:15 PM
Simon P I have two articles from the... 04-18-2012, 02:07 PM
Badger Speaking of damaged Enfields... 04-18-2012, 02:29 PM
Peter Laidler As a part time physics... 04-18-2012, 05:30 PM
ireload2 It is widely known to anyone... 04-18-2012, 11:44 PM
Bruce_in_Oz P. O. Ackley did a study post... 04-18-2012, 10:54 PM
newcastle Errrr. I'm not a part time... 04-19-2012, 02:38 AM
PrinzEugen Oh gawd here we go again -... 04-19-2012, 03:10 AM
jmoore If you take the bait and... 04-19-2012, 05:05 AM
tbonesmith Any chance we can just not... 04-19-2012, 05:07 AM
jmoore If we just let those who like... 04-19-2012, 05:12 AM
Badger Well said.... :thup: Let's... 04-19-2012, 06:44 AM
BubbaTheKid Here's a thought, what if... 04-19-2012, 09:18 AM
Stevo If you are referring to a... 04-19-2012, 11:05 AM
ROCK I hope not. I have learned... 04-20-2012, 12:10 AM
Brian Dick Hey there JM. We might be... 04-19-2012, 11:55 AM
Peter Laidler I agree with you Rock and... 04-20-2012, 03:31 AM
Stevo As I clearly said, Peter, the... 04-20-2012, 03:53 AM
PrinzEugen True enough No4Mk1(T). It's... 04-21-2012, 03:50 AM
villiers Just to keep the ball rolling... 04-21-2012, 05:35 AM
jmoore I'd rather it be buried in... 04-21-2012, 10:57 AM
Claven2 Just in case anyone reading... 04-21-2012, 11:17 AM
No4Mk1(T) Point well taken. I myself... 04-22-2012, 12:03 AM
villiers `Nuff sed! I certainly did... 04-22-2012, 03:27 AM
Badger I agree, which is why I... 04-21-2012, 07:23 AM
smellie Had a guy over on CGN the... 04-22-2012, 06:44 PM
jrswanson1 I would love to know how you... 04-25-2012, 11:48 AM
HOOKED ON HISTORY I was speeking in general... 04-25-2012, 12:14 PM
arkshooter I agree with jrs.. Usually... 04-26-2012, 10:54 AM
ROCK I guess it would be safe to... 04-26-2012, 08:13 PM
Rumpelhardt Some people seem bent on... 04-26-2012, 09:00 AM
MKV111Z To spare a dear friends... 04-27-2012, 08:14 AM
bigduke6 Patience, plenty of time and... 04-27-2012, 09:42 AM
ROCK Remaining intact after 41... 04-27-2012, 01:19 PM
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    67
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    05-30-2025
    Local Time
    08:56 AM

    Useful stuff

    Having seen some amazing "rants" on this and other forums I can appreciate the moderators difficulties but as a new Lee Enfield collector who plans to shoot his rifles I find threads like this extremely valuable. You have to integrate all your sources of info and weight the info according to apparent veracity of source but at the end of the day I'm developing an impression that right back to the first SMLE's (and maybe MLM/MLE) there have been no significant design or metallurgy issues that one needs to consider when deciding if a particular rifle is safe to shoot. All the comments would indicate that it boils down to wear and tear on the individual rifle and use of "normal" ammo. This is, in fact, quite a compliment to the original designers and, later, the Empires ability to maintain consistancy and quality in widely separated factories. Thanks again to all the experts that take the time to respond with details to these threads.

    Ridolpho
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Ridolpho For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Moderator
    (Lee Enfield Forums)
    No4Mk1(T)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    12-08-2024 @ 10:05 AM
    Location
    Vancouver Island
    Posts
    407
    Local Date
    05-30-2025
    Local Time
    06:56 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Ridolpho View Post
    Useful stuff
    Having seen some amazing "rants" on this and other forums I can appreciate the moderators difficulties but as a new Lee Enfield collector who plans to shoot his rifles I find threads like this extremely valuable. You have to integrate all your sources of info and weight the info according to apparent veracity of source but at the end of the day I'm developing an impression that right back to the first SMLE's (and maybe MLM/MLE) there have been no significant design or metallurgy issues that one needs to consider when deciding if a particular rifle is safe to shoot. All the comments would indicate that it boils down to wear and tear on the individual rifle and use of "normal" ammo. This is, in fact, quite a compliment to the original designers and, later, the Empires ability to maintain consistancy and quality in widely separated factories. Thanks again to all the experts that take the time to respond with details to these threads.

    Ridolpho
    Well I can’t disagree with your point in this case and I think you’ve summed it up quite nicely. A lot of this information can be useful. It can also end up being contradicting and therefor confusing to new Enfield owners and forum members. In the end the bickering and un-supported cut & past posts in past threads are what got under my skin to the point where it seriously undermined my desire to be a mod here. Thankfully this isn’t the case anymore.
    Maybe I should work on a sticky post entitled “Before you make an Enfield Action Strength post read these relevant threads” where I can post links to all these threads for newbies.

  4. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to No4Mk1(T) For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Strength of Krag actions
    By grouch in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 09-24-2012, 11:24 PM
  2. Trying to get my Enfield back in action
    By podmonkey in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-03-2011, 04:46 PM
  3. Can someone give me some info about this enfield action?
    By slickyboyboo in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-14-2011, 05:06 AM
  4. 96 swede reciever strength
    By lamarpye in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-05-2010, 09:01 PM
  5. Enfield Number 4 action target sight.
    By PrinzEugen in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-09-2008, 04:13 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Loading...