-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
1891 Argentine sporter accuracy
I bought this rifle in a package deal looks pretty nice but I'm getting 3 inch groups at 50 yards. I have to believe these rifles shoot better than that. I'm using Prvi 150 and 180 gr ammo. Both shoot as bad. Is there a secret to making these things shoot or have I got a lemon? Thanx
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
04-18-2012 09:55 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Barrels have VERY long throats. You may have to re-load. Try seating the bullet "long". That should help.
-
-
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Looks to have aftermarket sport stock. Screws are tight. The barrel fit looks equally tight on each side so no uneven pressure I assume. Barrel is 22". No scope, it has a Williams peep mounted. I've didn't want to waste the money on reloading dies if it wont shoot well. Does anyone make neck size dies for this round? Thanx
-
Legacy Member
I agree theres no sense in wasting money on reloading supplies if the gun won't shoot accurately but unless the bores completely shot out they can usually be made to shoot quite well. Can you post some pics of your rifle? The stock should'nt touch the barrel at any point past the knox form with the possible exception of a piller bed at the tip. When a bullet passes through the bore it causes vibrations, if the barrel isn't free to vibrate the same way every shot accuracy will suffer. Some rifles shoot best with ''floating'' barrrels and some do better with a piller bed at the stock tip that puts slight upwards pressure on the barrel. If a dollar bill won't freely slide between stock and barrel from tip to knox form it isn't floated.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Barrel is tight from knox form to end of stock. I assume these rifles weren't piller bedded when issued. Just seems like with such a thick barrel and a tight stock, bedding wouldn't be an issue at 50 yds. Something to look into tho. The bore on this looks perfect.
Last edited by bsaumph; 04-24-2012 at 09:10 AM.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I see what you mean about the long throat. I used my 303 britsh die to neck size a dummy round of the 7.65x53 then inserted a 174 grain bullet. When chambering the round with the cannelure sticking out 1/4" past the case mouth, I still don't get contact with the rifling. Also I'm using PPU ammo not Prvi. Not sure if that matters.
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Looks like a box of round noses and a lil bedding experimenting is in my future. Thanks for the input!
-
Advisory Panel
Old military rifles - long transition cones
The shooting world seems to be overly concerned with HPBTs as a means of obtaining the lowest possible BC, wind drift, whatever. But this focus on external ballistics is a false aim if the internal ballistics are bad as a result..
Many of the types of old service rifles that we use were designed in the 1890s, for long round-nose bullets, maybe later using "spitzer" bullets, but certainly not boattails. The transition cones tend to be long (very long in the case of the 1891 Mausers) and so boattails are poorly guided into the start of the rifling, with a lot of gas blow-by before they are finally engraved. Some shooters report better results with cast lead bullets, and I guess that this is because these bullets experience some degree of obturation (a.k.a. "bump-up") and thus actually fit the bore better than jacketed bullets.

Patrick
-