Myth-busting the M-1 Garand

[Sentryduty]

Despite it's very few shortcomings, the design beats all the other gas operated semi auto weapons of it's era hands down.

Honestly I wouldn't choose any of the three given a choice, and given the era, the early production SKS that was fielded in 1945 would be my choice. High volume of fire, low recoil impulse, light weight, shorter length, enough oomph to reach out to 400m and strike a man sized target with irons. It was probably the first rifle to lead us down the path of post WW2 combat rifle thinking.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[browningautorifle]

was fielded in 1945

It was all over then...not in standard use...

[Bob Seijas]

"SKS that was fielded in 1945"
Yeah, right, the famous SKS... what, never heard of it? Can't imagine why, it was so much better than the Garand... NOT.

[RCS]

Interesting that the SVT 40 and K-43 were gone by the Korean War, doubt the SKS was used much

[Lee Enfield]

Honestly I wouldn't choose any of the three given a choice, and given the era, the early production SKS that was fielded in 1945 would be my choice. High volume of fire, low recoil impulse, light weight, shorter length, enough oomph to reach out to 400m and strike a man sized target with irons. It was probably the first rifle to lead us down the path of post WW2 combat rifle thinking.

The 7.62x39 cartridge did not exist in 1945. The cartridge experimental production was 7.62x41mm.

The 7.62x39mm cartridge was type accepted in "mid" 1947.

The Russian sks45 was in production in 1949-1956.

[browningautorifle]

The cartridge experimental production was 7.62x41mm.

So...RCS, reach into your pocket and show us a clip of five, would you?