+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Uk F4 Phantoms being tested on HMS Eagle 1969

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member Gil Boyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last On
    02-12-2025 @ 05:16 AM
    Location
    Home of The Parachute Regiment & 16 Air Assault Brigade
    Posts
    4,772
    Real Name
    Gil Boyd
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    06:43 PM
    I have mentioned on here before about Abbey Wood MOD laying off 5,000 staff some years ago now, and just goes to show, they clearly were seen for what they were, the majority, a waste of space, literally!!.

    As they do, a new manager comes in and brings in loads of staff so he can relax a bit, to a point where nobody does anything fast, and really sits and twiddles their thumbs and does very little , whilst a long a corridor one person is working like a dog.........odd!

    I remember how this was all exposed. It was to do with a catapult system that was fitted to the then new aircraft carrier Queen Elizabeth and cost millions, which after installation, they realised a procurement person had bought a catapult system for an American jet we didn't, and were not going to use in the Royal Navy.

    The truth on the Navy carrier debacle? Industry got away with murder • The Register

    I had a friend, whose sole job was to fly around the world buying up all the spares for the VC10 aircraft's we had to keep them flying. She told me that her first class seat was always booked for her and the best hotels on arrival!!!

    Every day, I get a link to a webiste in the UKicon, where an MOD clearance site sells "brand new" Range Rovers, some armoured which cost millions to produce for sale. They currently have hundreds of Catapillar generators all boxed all new unused.....................how can procurement people get that so wrong!
    I developed and manufacturerd a torch, which MOD bought after it saved two EOD lads lives as it was so powerful if fopund trip wires in bunkers in Iraq. They would order them say 100 at a time, then I would see brand new ones exactly the same unused for sale on this particular website at a fraction of the cost WTF!!!Nuff said!!
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA

  2. #2
    Legacy Member GeeRam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Last On
    04-26-2025 @ 12:11 PM
    Location
    Berkshire, UK
    Posts
    883
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    07:43 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Gil Boyd View Post
    It was to do with a catapult system that was fitted to the then new aircraft carrier Queen Elizabeth and cost millions, which after installation, they realised a procurement person had bought a catapult system for an American jet we didn't, and were not going to use in the Royal Navy.
    Not quite.

    There was always the option during build to make the carriers cat n trap, which is what we should have done from day one, but dithering and the lack of steam generation for traditional catapaults (and the Harrier mafia within the RAF) pushed the no cats route, and then a change of mind in Govt and the announcement we would change the F-35B order for F-35C and fit the EMALS system that was being fitted to the new US carriers.
    Then they changed their mind again, and went back to the B and no cats n traps.

    We should have stayed with cats n traps and cancelled the ludicrously expensive not so stealthy jets and bought some new Super Hornets instead (just as USN are now doing) the money saved would have more than paid for the EMALS cat system and redesign of the carriers to accommodate them. This would have also allowed a much cheaper off the shelf buy of E-2D AEW aircraft (just as the Frenchicon have done) and shaved a fortune and time with all the Crowsnest fiasco. Which would have also allowed much better cross decking options with the USN as well as the French rather than only the USMC (which doesnt have organic AEW as they rely on the USN CBG's)

    As usual HMG wants to give the impression to the rest of the world we still deserve a place at the top table, but not wanting to actually spend the money to do it properly, and expect our wonderful Armed Forces to get on with it and make do.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. RFI 1966 No.4 Mk.I?
    By Havenot in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-18-2019, 10:29 AM
  2. Uniform tested - soldiers with M-1s - of course
    By RT Ellis in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Picture of the Day Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-24-2013, 12:45 PM
  3. On the assualt course 1966
    By MJ1 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-03-2010, 03:10 AM
  4. 1966 Tokarev
    By 7Star in forum Commercial Auction and Sale "Gossip"
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-22-2009, 08:51 PM
  5. Where have all the Phantoms gone?
    By RED in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 05-14-2009, 05:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts