+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 45

Thread: Need help with semi auto L4A4

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member SleepyDoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Last On
    01-25-2024 @ 11:55 PM
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    16
    Local Date
    07-02-2025
    Local Time
    05:02 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by tr63 View Post
    It should not close on the .308 No go gauge !! Your head space is off !! Sarco .308 barrels are short chambered . Historic Arms rewelded the receiver and did not allow for normal bolt and locking shoulder set back and that why you have incorrect long head space . There are many Historic Arms Bren's with all kinds of problems which head space is one . You need to change the the locking with a large/longer one to correct the head space so that the bolt will not close on the no go gauge and the cases should not separate.
    It is NOT a sarco barrel. It is an original UKicon 7.62x51 which if I'm understanding correctly may still close on 308 no go without issue. It wont close on the 7.62x51 max gauge.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member tr63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last On
    02-05-2022 @ 08:25 AM
    Location
    maine U.S.A.
    Posts
    404
    Real Name
    john senesy
    Local Date
    07-02-2025
    Local Time
    06:02 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by SleepyDoc View Post
    It is NOT a sarco barrel. It is an original UKicon 7.62x51 which if I'm understanding correctly may still close on 308 no go without issue. It wont close on the 7.62x51 max gauge.
    I understand it is not a SARCO barrel , Believe me it should not close on a .308 no-go gauge .

  3. #3
    Legacy Member ActionYobbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    10-11-2024 @ 11:03 AM
    Location
    Flippin Arky
    Posts
    417
    Local Date
    07-02-2025
    Local Time
    06:02 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by SleepyDoc View Post
    It is NOT a sarco barrel. It is an original UKicon 7.62x51 which if I'm understanding correctly may still close on 308 no go without issue. It wont close on the 7.62x51 max gauge.
    Thats a sarco barrel. They copied the profile from the South Afrcan barrels which is different from the English barrels. Also who ever populated that barrel cut the lugs of the sight base instead of milling the slots in the barrel because thats easier to do than a bit of milling (lazy lazy lazy)
    I am telling you straight that that is a sarco barrel (American made replacement) but you can have what ever fantasy you want.
    BTW that gun was never a Mk2 as you said but it was a Mk3.
    1ATSR 177AD & 4/3 RNSWR

  4. #4
    Legacy Member SleepyDoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Last On
    01-25-2024 @ 11:55 PM
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    16
    Local Date
    07-02-2025
    Local Time
    05:02 PM
    Thread Starter
    I guess this is my fault for not including more pictures initially. The barrel is as described. original UKicon, Enfield manufacture.
    I was wrong. Never should have trusted my memory. It is in fact a Mk3, converted to L4.
    Bolt is also Enfield.

    Not ideal to have it close on a 308 no-go, but considering the 7.62 max is the MAX for a 7.62 it is theoretically still safe. I would prefer a tighter chamber and I could have the barrel altered to set the chamber back, but I wanted to try less destructive things first. Something like polishing the chamber. If that or other less destructive methods don't work then I can have the chamber set back and re-check headspace. I will probably need a gunsmith to do the latter for me for safety concerns and so I don't mess up the whole barrel. There is enough room from the receiver to the locking block to do this at present time.

    I will try to find some throat erosion gauges or measure some spent brass cases to see if there is excessive expansion. The chamber does appear to have more scratches and irregularities than I remember as is evident on the cases. It is hard to believe that would cause anything, but weirder things have happened.

    If anyone else has recommendations on how to polish the chamber or what tools to use, please let me know. Any idea what size of shotgun mop would work best? Is flitz the best to safely polish without taking off too much material? I saw someone use a mop or something with high grit sandpaper, but that seems a little much to me.

    If anyone has other ideas I would also like to hear them before going down this rabbit hole.

    I can also supply any other information or pictures if it would help someone to make another diagnosis or figure something out.

    Thank you all for your help in this matter. I will update you as I make alterations based on your input. Given my terrible schedule right now it might be a bit to get something done, but I will try to keep you all in the loop.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Auto Ordnance Thompson Semi-Auto 45
    By Aragorn243 in forum Other U.S. Service Rifles
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-18-2016, 01:13 PM
  2. Semi Auto .303
    By RJW NZ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-01-2013, 07:40 PM
  3. Why did the USA go semi-auto when others did not?
    By Amsdorf in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 11-24-2011, 06:49 PM
  4. Semi-auto M14?
    By Stevo in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-19-2011, 03:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts