Old CSP Site Reopens

[JGaynor]

The owners of the CSP site could have reopened their site without all the ugly invective that has appeared in the last few days.



Jim

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Mike Haas]

The owners of the CSP site could have reopened their site without all the ugly invective that has appeared in the last few days.



Jim

Frankly I don't need to visit an establishment wherein the managment can't or won't make it a civil place to visit.

If CSP will tolerate folks like RTL and Bill Hollinger (etal) being called "pukes" and let the post stand, I will simply change the channel and not view it again.

I'm now truely sorry I contributed to the CSP Relief Fund. Hopefully my contribution helped Dick & Gloria on a personal level. I do wish it had been better used in the managment of the CSP Forum.

I'm gonna "un-subscribe" from CSP and remain here as a member. Perhaps any minor imput I contribute, and perhaps financial help will be better appreciated.

Mike Haas

[FW!]

It seems most of the slamming is on the 2nd Ammendment site. I quit going there a long time ago. I thank you for welcoming me to your site & will continue to visit. As primarily a rimfire shooter I spend most of my time in RFC but visit other sites for info. I will continue here as I do have some milsurp rifles