Well stated Buccaneer. The Ethical Issue of Safety should always supersede the aesthetics. Somehow antique gun restoration has gotten confused with antique car restoration, where putting on upgrades and improvements is cherished and increases value, even if not original. This happens not just with Lee Enfields -- M-1 Carbines have the same thing: "mixmasters" being refitted with what would have been original parts with the proper stamps.

Safety in guns should always be paramount and never sacrificed.

But I'm also curious where is the line between authenticity and restoration? How about the replacement of a mundane L-backsight with a milled Mk1 sight? Or the replacement of a gouged plain lower handguard with a grooved one? etc. etc.

I'm having a Long Branch sniper restored. It was stripped of everything but barrel, receiver, and butt stock. What constitutes an "ethical" restoration. Where is the line between authenticity and restoration? Member's thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks