+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Perspective

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member Sapper740's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2022
    Last On
    Today @ 07:32 AM
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,051
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    11:18 AM
    [/QUOTE]Bismarck was a heavy cruiser. Her citadel was protected by 7-8" armor, for instance.[/QUOTE]

    The Bismarck was every bit a battleship with 12.5" of armor on her conning tower (citadel) and 13.8" belts and turret faces.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Bismarck.jpg‎
Views:	79
Size:	73.8 KB
ID:	134679  
    Last edited by Sapper740; 01-23-2024 at 04:16 PM.

  2. #2
    Moderator
    (M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles)
    Bob Womack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 07:31 AM
    Location
    Somewhere Between Clever and Stupid
    Posts
    3,671
    Real Name
    Bob Womack
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    12:18 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Sapper740 View Post
    The Bismarck was every bit a battleship with 12.5" of armor on her conning tower (citadel) and 13.8" belts and turret faces.
    I'm sorry, I was quoting the figures for the transverse bulkheads at the for and aft ends of the citadel lower, which were in fact 8" thick. The upper citadel transverse bulkheads were 4"-5.71" thick. While the conning tower had thicker armor, the rest of the citadel did not. The Germanicon designers put more stock in the horizontal armor to protect from vertically-arriving shot than the vertical armor to protect from raking fire, apparently thinking her long guns would prevent her from getting into a knife fight with any other large ship.

    Bob
    "It is said, 'Go not to the elves for counsel for they will say both no and yes.' "

    Frodo Baggins to Gildor Inglorion, The Fellowship of the Ring

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. An Armourer's Perspective questions
    By Atticus Thraxx in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-17-2020, 06:14 PM
  2. Bonus - same scene different perspective
    By Mark in Rochester in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Picture of the Day Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-26-2016, 07:46 PM
  3. An Armourer's Perspective: .303 No. 4 (T) Sniper Rifle and the H&H Connection
    By mjolnir2 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 03-01-2015, 05:45 AM
  4. New Look at Mark 4 #1* [T] After Reading "An Armourer's Perspective"
    By Entry Level in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 06-10-2012, 06:14 PM
  5. Questions on markings on a perspective Remington 1903 purchase.
    By Wizard in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-09-2011, 08:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts