+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Perspective

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Eaglelord17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last On
    05-01-2025 @ 06:54 PM
    Location
    Sault Ste. Marie, ON
    Posts
    1,270
    Real Name
    A.N.
    Local Date
    05-04-2025
    Local Time
    06:37 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Sapper740 View Post
    Yes, President Reagan wanted a 600 ship Navy and part of that proved an opportunity to reactivate the four Iowa-class battleships. It wasn't just numbers that the four Iowa-class battleships provided, they were upgraded with new combat systems, removing 4 of the five-inch 38's in order to accommodate Harpoon anti-ship missiles, Tomahawk cruise missiles, and Phalanx CIWS close-in weapon systems. Each ship retained its nine sixteen-inch guns since the new, modern Navy had no naval guns over five inches in diameter, and the big guns of the battleships would prove invaluable in the event of an amphibious landing.
    Those 16" guns also shredded the Iraqis during the Gulf War, exceptionally effective I think would be the best way to describe it.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to Eaglelord17 For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 11:52 PM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    8,098
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    05-05-2025
    Local Time
    06:37 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Eaglelord17 View Post
    Those 16" guns also shredded the Iraqis
    Yes they were rather devastating.

    In Pursuit also I remember a gunner in one of Rodney's turrets saying at the beginning of the engagement the breech when firing was in the bottom of the turret but when they closed on the Bismarck the breech was level.
    In fact Rodney closed to point blank range for her 16" guns which I think they said in the book was 3000 yards hence as Bob stated the deck armour was thicker rather than the raking shots she was receiving.

    In my book I have Tiger I & II Combat Tactics By Jentz the brits in WWII did a huge test on captured Tiger 1 & Tiger 2 armour and it was found to be far superior to what any of the stuff the allies had the testing involved various calibers but predominantly the 6pdr at 0 - 30 degrees.
    Consensus was that the Germans made very good tough to defeat armour.
    Last edited by CINDERS; 01-27-2024 at 02:36 AM. Reason: Information correction

  4. Thank You to CINDERS For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. An Armourer's Perspective questions
    By Atticus Thraxx in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-17-2020, 06:14 PM
  2. Bonus - same scene different perspective
    By Mark in Rochester in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Picture of the Day Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-26-2016, 07:46 PM
  3. An Armourer's Perspective: .303 No. 4 (T) Sniper Rifle and the H&H Connection
    By mjolnir2 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 03-01-2015, 05:45 AM
  4. New Look at Mark 4 #1* [T] After Reading "An Armourer's Perspective"
    By Entry Level in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 06-10-2012, 06:14 PM
  5. Questions on markings on a perspective Remington 1903 purchase.
    By Wizard in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 07-09-2011, 08:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts